Summer 2011 Feature Article
| |
| REBUILT: Community leaders are confident that the Wadena 2.0 visioning process helped avoid some of the pains experienced by other disaster-stricken communities. | |
![]() |
Arriving at a consensus about the town’s rebuilding priorities was not easy for Wadena 2.0. “In community planning of any kind, there are usually a million different ideas and they’re all good,” said Dan Frank, Initiative Foundation program manager for community development, who served on the group’s board. “Communities need to have an open process so that every person gets their voice heard. The large group gives input on what the highest priorities should be, and then it’s up to smaller task forces and leaders to bring the ideas to action.”
One of the first decisions the group faced was whether or not to immediately replace the indoor ice arena that was part of the city’s community center. Insurance money was available to rebuild it and some hockey parents wanted to move fast, Frank said. But other stakeholders—including the city and school district— hoped a rebuilt community center and high school could be integrated so that facilities could be shared.
![]() | |
DON NILES (with Initiative Foundation president Kathy Gaalswyk): “Because of the amount of participation, the town has a plan that has the major stakeholders and the public behind it.” | |
The Wadena 2.0 group took the design team’s recommendations and brought them to the individual stakeholders— the city, county, school district, economic development authority, employers and community support groups—who fleshed the plans out, Niles said.
The city and school then collaborated to plan a rebuilt high school and community center that would be connected by a skyway instead of a road.
“(Connecting them) will maximize the use of both facilities by the general public in Wadena and get us the biggest bang for the public dollar,” said Dean Uselman, executive director of the Wadena Economic Development Authority and the city’s Planning and Zoning department. “Now, the weight room in the wellness center and the walking track in the high school gym will be connected and both will be available to the public.”
In addition, a proposal for the community center calls for a warm-water therapeutic pool that would be leased to Tri-County Health Care for their use, but also open to the public at other hours. The tentative agreement depends on the Minnesota Legislature’s willingness to provide public bonding dollars to help fund the $19 million center’s construction.
![]() | |
PLANNING PROGRESS: Rebuilding recommendations include replacing the collection of small fairground buildings with with a multipurpose building that could be used as an event center. |
Putting together a vision of a community that’s different from the way it was before a disaster can, if not handled correctly, create resentment and hostility, said Chris Hallum, the mayor of Rushford, a southeastern Minnesota town on the Root River.
Hallum should know. He was elected two years after a 2007 flood submerged most of the town under water and caused nearly $50 million in damage to the town of 2,350.
Hallum came to office on a wave of discontent with how the recovery was being handled by City Hall, as well as decisions about where to apply $17 million in state flood recovery funds. City leaders spent limited funds on new infrastructure and rebuilding the municipal liquor store while existing roads and services were still in bad shape.
![]() | |
| SHARED SPACE: The city and school collaborated to plan a new high school and community center that would be connected by a skyway instead of a road, thereby maximizing the use of both buildings by the general public. | |
